GNGTS 2015 - Atti del 34° Convegno Nazionale

The data collected on information sources indicate that television (37.44%) is clearly the most important source of information, the Internet (20.88%) and newspapers (22:46%) are left behind by 15 points or more. As regards the data on the occurrence of natural hazards other than earthquakes show that flooding (36%) and landslides (29%) are considered the most frequent other natural hazards. Regarding the participation at risk reduction activities, only 4.71% of the sample declare to have attended an initiative of education or awareness, however this little part of the sample has a high level of involvement in these initiatives (82%). Conclusions. The CATI survey carried out on a statistical sample (N=4,012) and the data collected on the web (N=8,575) represent a good reference basis of the seismic perception of Italian population. Soon we will be able to complete the interpretation and comparison of scores of perception with all indicators of risk. This important advancement was possible by introducing in the questionnaire some questions on the characteristics of the house related to its physical seismic vulnerability. These data should allow us to compare the perception of the vulnerability with the vulnerability data reported by respondents. Similarly, we are already working in order to compare the other indicators considered in the questionnaire: Exposure; People & Community and Phenomenon. Furthermore, as regards the comparison with the data of Hazard, we are able to make reference both to seismic zones and to the intervals of PGA. The work done in these two years of research has initiated a permanent observatory on the perception of the risk of earthquakes in Italy. At the web site www.terremototest.it , the data on seismic risk perception are continuously collected. CATI survey and the web data sets, collected in these two years, represent a good data base to assess possible change on seismic risk perception because of seismic sequences or swarm, or to make comparison between a specific subgroup of population, with respect to the national seismic risk perception scores. We plan to complete the observatory on the seismic risk perception in Italy by implementing the web site with a section dedicated to the answers online. This part will be organised to provide a response to each individual questionnaire and provide information on the whole risk perception data in our country. In fact, after about 3 years since our first research proposal on this issue, we still think that analysis of risk perception data is able to produce useful indications to design seismic risk reduction activities. The processing of the data collected on the seismic risk perception will give us detailed information on the national territory useful to launch campaigns of awareness and improve risk reduction. References S. Bolasco, Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Metodi, strategie e criteri d’interpretazione, 1999, Roma, Carocci. M. Crescimbene, F. La Longa, (2015) Terremoti: tra percezione e realtà, pp. 227-244 In Terremoti, Comunicazione, Diritto. Riflessioni sul processo alla “Commissione Grandi Rischi”, a cura di A. Amato, A. Cerase, F. Galadini – Franco Angeli Editore pag.227-244 ISBN 978-88-917-1271-4. M. Crescimbene, F. La Longa, R. Camassi, N.A. Pino, (2015). The Seismic Risk Perception Questionnaire. In: Peppoloni Silvia and Giuseppe Di Capua (Eds.) ���������� ��� ���� ��� �������������� �� ������������� ����� Geoethics: the Role and Responsibility of Geoscientists 2015, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 419, ISBN 978-1-86239-726-2, pp. 69-77. M. Crescimbene, F. La Longa, R. Camassi, N. A. Pino, L. Peruzza (2014) What’s the Seismic Risk Perception in Italy? - pp 69-75 . In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory – Volume 7 Education, Professional Ethics and Public Recognition of Engineering Geology, Part II Geoethics and Natural Hazards: Communication, Education and the Science-Policy-Practice Interface. �������� ������� �������� ������� ��������� ����� ��������� ������� Editors: Giorgio Lollino, Massimo Arattano, Marco Giardino, Ricardo Oliveira, Silvia Peppoloni. ���� ����������������� ���� ����������������� ������� ��� �������������� ISBN 978-3-319-09302-4 ISBN 978-3-319-09303-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3- 319-09303-1 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014946956 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2122/9286. Cronbach, L.J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, Vol.16, n.3, 297-334. Gruppo di Lavoro MPS (2004). Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall’Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003. Rapporto Conclusivo per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, aprile 2004, 65 pp. � � ���������� + 5 appendici. 298 GNGTS 2015 S essione 2.3