GNGTS 2016 - Atti del 35° Convegno Nazionale

GNGTS 2016 S essione A matrice 89 Fig. 2 – Panels A-D: comparison of InSAR models: A) 1997 Colfiorito earthquake (Moro et al ., 2007); B) 2009 L’Aquila earthquake; C) 2016 Amatrice earthquake, solution obtained from Sentinel1 data; D) 2005 Dinar, Turkey earthquake (Douglas and Funning, 2016). The virtual, observed or presumed – depending on the cases - surface expression of the fault is shown by a black line. Panels E-F: comparison of the “coseismic signature” obtained for two distinct model faults, showing the extent of coseismic uplift and subsidence per unit slip: E) is an average of the models obtained for the 1997, 2009 and 2016 earthquakes; F) is a model that reproduces the 1995 Dinar earthquake. See also Tabs. 1 and 2.