GNGTS 2019 - Atti del 38° Convegno Nazionale

GNGTS 2019 S essione 1.2 151 Bibliografia Argnani, A., Favali, P., Frugoni, F., Gasperini, M., Ligi, M., Marani, M., e Mele, G.;1996: Tettonica dell’Adriatico meridionale. Mem. Soc. Geol. It., 51, 227-237. Bosellini, A., Neri, C., e Luciani, V.; 1993: Guida ai carbonati Cretaceo-Eocenici di scarpata e bacino del Gargano (Italia meridionale). In: Annali dell’Univ. di Ferrara (Nuova Serie), Sezione IX, Scienze della Terra vol. 4, Supplemento,pp. 1-77. Cati, A., Sartorio, D. e Venturini, S.; 1987: Carbonate plaforms in the subsurface of the Northern Adriatic Sea. In: Carulli, G.B., Cucchi, F. & Pirini Raddrizzani, C. (eds.): Evolution of the Karstic carbonate platform: relation with other periadriatic carbonate platforms. Mem. Soc. Geol. It 40, 295 – 308. Channell, J. E. T., D’Argenio, B., e Horvath, F.; 1979: Adria, the African promontory, in Mesozoic Mediterranean palaeogeography. Earth-Science Reviews, 15, 213-292. Del Ben, A., Geletti, R. e Mocnil, A.; 2010: Relation between recent tectonics and inherited Mesozoic structures of the Del Ben, A., Moćnik, A., Volpi, V., & Karvelis, P.; 2015: Old domains in the South Adria plate and their relationship with the West Hellenic front. Journal of Geodynamics, 89, 15-28. Finetti, I.R.; 2005b: Geodynamic evolution of the Mediterranean region from the Permo-Triassic Ionian opening to the present, constrained by the lithospheric CROP seismic data. In: Finetti I. (ed), CROP project: Deep seismic exploration of the Central Mediterranean and Italy, Atlases in Geoscience 1, Elsevier, 767-776. Grandic, S.; 2009: Periplatform clastics of Crotian offshore and their petroleum geological significance. Nafta 60, 503 – 511. Lofi, J., Sage, F., Deverchere, J., Loncke, L., Maillard, A., Gaullier, V., Thinon, H. G., Guennoc, P. e Gorini, C.; 2011: Refining or knowledge of the Messinian salinity Crisis record in the offshore domain through multi-site seismic analysis. Bulletin de la Scociete Geologique de France 182, 163-180. Mattavelli, L., Novelli, L., e Anelli, L.; 1991: Occurrence of hydrocarbons in the Adriatic basin. In : Spencer A.M. (Ed), Generation, accumulation, and production of Europe’s hydrocarbon, Special Pubblication of the European Association of Petroleum Geoscientists, 369-380. Nicolai, C. e Gambini, R.; 2007: Sttructural architecture of the Adria-platform-and-basin system. In : Mazzoti, A., Patacca, A. and Scandoni, p. (eds), results of the CROP project, Sub-Project CROP04, Southern Apennines (Italy), Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital., Special Issue N.7, 21-37. Pamić, J., Gušić, I. e Jelaska, V.; 1998: Geodynamic evolution of the Central Dinarides. Tectophysics 297, 251-268. Patacca, E., Scandone, P., Di Luzio, E., Cavinato, G. P., e Parotto, M.; 2008: Structural architecture of the central Apennines: Interpretation of the CROP 11 seismic profile from the Adriatic coast to the orographic divide. Tectonics, 27, TC3006. Stampflì, G. M.; 2005: Plate tectonics of the Apulia-Adria microcontinents. In : Finetti, I.R. (ed), CROP Project: Deep Seismic explorations of the Central Mediterranean and Italy, Atlatses in Geoscience 1, Elsevier, 747-766. Vai, G.B.; 1994: Crustal evolution and basement elements in the Italian area: paleogeography and characterization. Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl., 36, 411-434. ViDEPI (Visibility of Petroleum Exploration Data in Italy), 2009. http://www.videpi.com/videpi/videpi.asp Vlahović, I., Tišliar, J., Velić, I. e Matičec D.; 2005: Evolution of the Adriatic Carbonate Platform: Paleogeography, main events and depositional dynamics. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology,220, 330-360. Zappaterra, E.; 1994: Source rock distribution model of the Periadriatic region. AAPG Bull., 78/3, 333-354. THE CONTRIBUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSES IN UNRAVELLING ACTIVE GEODYNAMIC MODELS: AN EXAMPLE FROM NORTHEASTERN SICILY F. Pavano 1 , S. Catalano 1 , G. Romagnoli 2 , G. Tortorici 1 1 Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy 2 Institute of Geological Environmental and Geoengineering - CNR, Rome, Italy Active geodynamic and seismotectonic models have to summarize the evidence of the active kinematics at different scale of observation, from the meso-scale structural field analyses to the regional-scale geodesy. However, apart the kinematic compatibility of the results from different branches (e.g. tectonics, regional seismicity, seismic exploration and geodesy) both the