GNGTS 2022 - Atti del 40° Convegno Nazionale

GNGTS 2022 Sessione 2.2 269 aleatory and epistemic uncertainties considered in the research. The procedure has shown the significance of the cognitive procedures towards the seismic vulnerability assessment of historical centers. The different outcomes of the work point out a discrete vulnerability requiring specific attentions. The research is still ongoing, and it is targeted at the calibration of the empirical methodologies by an implementation of the analytical outcomes into hybrid strategies. These studies will allow to forecast the risk-related economic direct and indirect losses, permitting to investigate the impact of strengthening solutions at the urban scale. In addition, these evaluations are at the basis of the emergency management and the evacuation planning useful in the post-event governance. In addition, the administration of historical center encourages to consider different risk sources into multi-hazard perspectives for a comprehensive urban management (Arrighi et al., 2022). Acknowledgements. This research belongs to the Protocol signed between the Municipality of San Piero e Scarperia and Department of Architecture of the University of Florence for the seismic vulnerability assessment of the historical centre of Scarperia. References Arrighi C., Tanganelli M., Cristofaro M.T., Cardinali V., Marra A., Castelli F., De Stefano M.; 2022: Multi-risk assessment in a historical city . Nat. Hazards. Cardinali V., Cristofaro M.T., Ferrini M., Nudo R., Paoletti B., Tanganelli M.; 2020: An interdisciplinary approach for the seismic vulnerability assessment of historical centres in masonry building aggregates: application to the city of Scarperia, Italy. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIV-M-1-2020, 667–674, https://doi. org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-1-2020-667-2020. Cardinali V., Cristofaro M.T., Ferrini M., Nudo R., Paoletti B., Tanganelli M.; 2021: A multiscale approach for the seismic vulnerability assessment of historical centres in masonry building aggregates: cognitive approach and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Arch Herit. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1992536. Chieffo N., Formisano; 2019: Comparative Seismic Assessment Methods for Masonry Building Aggregates: A Case Study. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5(), 123–. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2019.00123. Formisano A., Florio G., Landolfo R., Mazzolani F.M.; 2011: Un metodo per la valutazione su larga scala della vulnerabilità sismica degli aggregati storici. XV Convegno ANDIS - L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia. Giovinazzi S., Lagomarsino, S.; 2004: A macroseismic model for the vulnerability assessment of buildings. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. Grunthal, G.; 1998: European Macroseismic Scale. Chaiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, vol. 15 Luxembourg. Maio R., Tsionis G.; 2015: Seismic fragility curves for the European building stock: review and evaluation of analytical fragility curves. EUR 27635 EN. European Laboratory for Structural Assessment, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra (Italy). NaleM., Minghini F., Chiozzi A., Tralli A.; 2021: Fragility functions for local failure mechanisms in unreinforcedmasonry buildings: a typological study in Ferrara, Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 6049–6079 https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10518-021-01199-6. Pinto P. E., Giannini R., Franchin P.; 2004: Seismic reliability analysis of structures. Pavia: IUSS Press. Sandoli A., Calderoni B., Lignola G.P., Prota A.; 2022: Seismic vulnerability assessment of minor Italian urban centres: development of urban fragility curves. Bull Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01385-0.