GNGTS 2022 - Atti del 40° Convegno Nazionale

GNGTS 2022 Sessione 2.2 309 It can be noted that the pushover-based inelastic single-degree of freedom system provides results very close to those achieved by non-linear dynamic analyses in ABAQUS/Standard, and thus can be used as a viable alternative in the context of preliminary investigations about seismic vulnerability but leading to more conservative probabilistic values. However, further studies on different glass panel configurations or taking into account the interaction with the primary structure are needed in order to assess the accuracy of the procedure. References Behr R.A. and Belarbi A.; 1996: Seismic test methods for architectural glazing systems . Earthq. Spectra, 12 (1). Behr R.A.; 1998: Seismic performance of architectural glass in mid-rise curtain wall . J. Archit. Eng., 94-98. Bianchi S., Ciurlanti J. and Pampanin S.; 2019: Seismic vulnerability of non-structural components: from traditional solutions to innovative low-damage systems . Proceedings SECED 2019 Conference. CNR-DT 210/2013. Istruzioni per la progettazione, l’esecuzione ed il controllo di costruzioni con elementi strutturali di vetro . Haldimann M., Luible A. and Overend M.; 2008: Structural use of glass . Zurich (CH): IABSE. ISBN 978-3-85748-119-2. Jalayer F., De Risi R., Manfredi G.; 2014: Bayesian Cloud Analysis: Efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression . Bull.Earthq.Eng., 13, 1183:1203. Karavasilis T. L. and Seo C.Y.; 2011: Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems . Eng. Struct., 33(8), 2248-2258. Mattei S. and Bedon C.; 2021: Analytical Fragility Curves for Seismic Design of Glass Systems Based on Cloud Analysis . Symmetry, 13(8), 1541. Memari A.M., Behr R.A., Kremer P.A.; 2003: Seismic Behavior of Curtain Walls Containing Insulating Glass Units . J. Archit. Eng., 9 (2), 70-85. Memari A.M., O’Brien W.C., Kremer P.A. and Behr R.A.; 2011: Architectural Glass Seismic Behavior Fragility Curve Development . Report No. FEMA P-58/BD-3.9, 2011, 2. NTC-2018. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Decreto Ministeriale 17 gennaio 2018 . Nuzzo I., Aiello C., Bonati A., Caterino N., Coppola O. and Occhiuzzi A.; 2020: Fragility curves of glass facades via analytical simplified modelling . 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 17WCEE, C003314. O’Brien W.C., Memari A.M., Kremer P.A. and Behr R.A.; 2012: Fragility Curves for Architectural Glass in Stick-Built Glazing Systems . Earthq. Spectra, 2 (28), 639-665. Porter K. A., Kennedy R., Bachman R.; 2007: Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering . Earthq. Spectra, 23, 471-489. Zentner I., Gündel M. and Bonfils N.; 2017: Fragility analysis methods: Review of existing approaches and application. Nucl. Eng. Des., 323, 245-258. Fig. 3– IM-based fragility curves for (a) Linear SDOF and (b) Non-Linear SDOF.