GNGTS 2023 - Atti del 41° Convegno Nazionale

Session 2.2 GNGTS 2023 Fig. 2 - Boxplot diagram of the differences between observed and ShakeMap predicted intensity values for the entire validation dataset (78 earthquakes), using Pea08 and the default virtual IPE available in ShakeMap. Fig. 3 - Boxplot diagram of the differences between observed and ShakeMap predicted intensity values, using Pea08 and the default virtual IPE available in ShakeMap. The residuals are classified into (a) distance and (b) intensity categories. References Albini P., Musson R. M., Rovida A., Locati M., Gomez Capera A. A. and Viganò D.; 2014: The global earthquake history. Earthquake spectra, 30, 607–624, DOI 10.1193/122013EQS297. Allen T. I., Wald D. J., Hotovec A. J., Lin K., Earle P. S. and Marano K. D.; 2008: An Atlas of ShakeMaps for selected global earthquakes. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Bakun W. H. and Wentworth C. M.; 1997: Estimating earthquake location and magnitude from seismic intensity data. B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 1502–1521, DOI 10.1785/BSSA0870061502. Bindi D., Pacor F., Luzi L., Puglia R., Massa M., Ameri G. and Paolucci R.; 2011: Ground motion prediction equations derived from the italian strong motion database. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 1899–1920, DOI 10.1007/s10518-011-9313-z. Faenza L., Pierdominici S., Camassi R., Michelini A., Ercolani E. and Lauciani V.; 2013: The shakemap atlas for the city of naples, Italy. Seismological Research Letters, 84, 963–972, DOI 10.1785/0220130048. Gasperini P., Bernardini F., Valensise G. and Boschi E.; 1999: Defining seismogenic sources from historical earthquake felt reports. B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 94–110, DOI 10.1785/BSSA0890010094.