GNGTS 2023 - Atti del 41° Convegno Nazionale
Session 2.3 GNGTS 2023 2022): one of the most puzzling questions is to identify different publics’ needs, information collection strategies and favourite channels as to gain attention and to build trust. Our study is aimed at providing an analytic segmentation of a representative sample of Italian population (N = 1500) to identify and classify different recipients’ profiles and their communicational needs in order to carry out a well-tailored tsunami risk communication strategy. We try to identify different groups with homogeneous characteristics and then better address points of strength, weakness and blind spots. Multivariate statistical methods are used in order to identify homogeneous groups or profiles of respondents with respect to behaviour relating to the effectiveness of tsunami risk communication. In particular, the study focuses on the critical publics, namely those groups being characterised by a lower level of risk perception and more limited knowledge, with the aim of highlighting the critical factors that can hinder communication (including, for example, educational degree, region, distance from the sea and choice of channels used to obtain information) and possible strategies to be implemented in the dissemination of messages to counteract perceptual biases and false beliefs. References Akbar, Z., Suryaratri, R. D., Tri, Y., Gumelar, G., and Ariyani, M. (2020). Disaster risk perception and household disaster preparedness: Lesson learned from tsunami in banten. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 448 (1), 012099. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012099 Alam, E. (2016). Earthquake and tsunami knowledge, risk perception and preparedness in the SE Bangladesh. J. Geogr. Nat. Disast. 6 (1), 1–7. doi:10. 4172/2167-0587.1000154 Arce, R. S. C., Onuki, M., Esteban, M., and Shibayama, T. (2017). Risk awareness and intended tsunami evacuation behaviour of international tourists in Kamakura City, Japan. Int. J. disaster risk Reduct. 23, 178–192. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.005 Arias, J. P., Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., and Repetto, P. B. (2017). Hazard proximity and risk perception of tsunamis in coastal cities: Are people able to identify their risk? PLoS one 12 (10), e0186455. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186455 Balog‐Way, D., McComas, K., & Besley, J. (2020). The evolving field of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 40(S1), 2240-2262. Bird, D., and Dominey-Howes, D. (2008). Testing the use of a ‘questionnaire survey instrument’ to investigate public perceptions of tsunami hazard and risk in Sydney, Australia. Nat. Hazards (Dordr). 45 (1), 99–122. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9172-8 Bostrom, A. (2003). Future risk communication. Futures, 35(6), 553-573.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ4NzI=