GNGTS 2024 - Atti del 42° Convegno Nazionale

Session 2.2 GNGTS 2024 Figure 1. Maps (coordinate system UTM zone N32) of the best δS2S model: median predicCons (log10 units) (a) and associated variance (b) for PGA. Acknowledgements This work was parCally supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) in the framework of the project PRIN-SERENA, coordinated by Prof. Dario Albarello of the University of Siena and by the Centrum of Seismic Hazard (CPS, INGV) within the WP4 - Shaking Scenarios. The authors wish to thank the Working Group of Work Package 06 “Empirical TesCng and CalibraCon” and their coordinator Giovanna Cultrera of INGV-Roma. References Anderson, J., Hough, S. (1984). A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum at high frequencies. BulleCn of the Seismological Society of America. 74. 1969-1993. Bard P. Y. Bora S. S. Hollender F. Laurendeau A., and Traversa P. (2020). Are the standard Vs30- kappa host-to-target adjustments the only way to get consistent hard-rock ground mo9on predic9on? Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 2049–2068. Bergamo, P., C. Hammer, and D. Fäh (2021). Correspondence between Site Amplifica9on and Topographical, Geological Parameters: Colla9on of Data from Swiss and Japanese Sta9ons, and Neural Networks-Based Predic9on of Local Response , Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 112, 1008–1030, doi: 10.1785/0120210225 Castellaro S. Mulargia F., and Rossi P. L. (2008). Vs30: Proxy for seismic amplifica9on? Seismol. Res. Leb. 79, 540–543, doi: hbps://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.4.540 a) b)