GNGTS 2024 - Atti del 42° Convegno Nazionale

Session 3.1 GNGTS 2024 Results In fgure 2a and 2b the results are shown, with a comparison between a porton of the airborne and the ground DCIP modelled chargeability (phase) with our modelling approach. Figure 2. a) Example of ground DCIP phase results and, in dashed line, the AEM survey fown above; b) Partal Ground DCIP vs Airborne IP phase results As visible from the fgures, a great correlaton between the airborne and ground is obtained when modelling with the presented approach. The airborne chargeability model shows a consistent structure with the ground model in depth and a geology-controlled behaviour in the shallower near surface. A known mineralizaton has also been mapped with the AIP. The diferences in the near surface are a consequence of the big electric dipoles dimension used for the ground DCIP